Add connerlambden/helium-mcp to Integrations#1204
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new "Third-party MCP integrations" subsection is added to the integrations section of ChangesIntegrations docs update
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
149-149: Add a section header to clarify the Helium MCP entry's context.The Helium MCP bullet point on line 149 appears between the "Claude Code Plugin" section and the "### MCP Server" section without a clear organizational context. This creates ambiguity about whether it's a plugin addition, a separate integration category, or misplaced content.
Add a section header (e.g.,
### Third-party MCP Integrations) above line 149 to explicitly group this entry and clarify its relationship to the surrounding sections.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@README.md` at line 149, The Helium MCP entry lacks a section header to clarify its organizational context in the README.md file. Add a new section header (such as `### Third-party MCP Integrations`) immediately above the Helium MCP bullet point to explicitly group this entry and make clear its relationship to the surrounding Claude Code Plugin and MCP Server sections. This will resolve the ambiguity about whether this is a plugin addition, separate integration category, or misplaced content.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 149: The Helium MCP entry lacks a section header to clarify its
organizational context in the README.md file. Add a new section header (such as
`### Third-party MCP Integrations`) immediately above the Helium MCP bullet
point to explicitly group this entry and make clear its relationship to the
surrounding Claude Code Plugin and MCP Server sections. This will resolve the
ambiguity about whether this is a plugin addition, separate integration
category, or misplaced content.
05db4e9 to
d9f373d
Compare
Moves entry out of Claude Code Plugin section; fixes grammar and docs link.
d9f373d to
63de5db
Compare
|
Addressed the review: moved the entry out of the Claude Code Plugin block into a new Third-party MCP integrations section (after the prompts.chat MCP Server docs). Also fixed |
Adds a Third-party MCP integrations subsection under Integrations — README only, no
prompts.csvchanges.Helium MCP: 37-dimensional news bias scoring, market data, and ML options pricing.
Test plan
This PR updates
README.mddocumentation to add and reorganize a Helium MCP server integration entry.connerlambden/helium-mcpwith links to an interactive demo and documentation/REST API.prompts.chatMCP Server documentation).The author confirmed these are README-only changes and that
prompts.csvwas not updated.