docs: Clarify assisted contribution expectations

[tomatotomata]

Summary

• add a short section for contributors using code or writing assistants
• ask contributors to disclose assistance and review the rendered diff and description
• reinforce focused, actionable review communication

Verification

• git diff --check
• documentation-only change

Assistance disclosure

I used an LLM to help draft the wording, then reviewed and edited the final text and verified the rendered diff manually.

Relates to: #3939

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.54%. Comparing base (e496a87) to head (fbe54ce).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4427   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.54%   97.54%           
=======================================
  Files         194      194           
  Lines       19836    19836           
=======================================
  Hits        19350    19350           
+ Misses        269      268    -1     
- Partials      217      218    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[gmlewis]

Although some of this is mentioned in the "Tips" section above it, I'm OK with adding this, but will NOT be closing the issue referred to in the description, as I have found that particular issue to be extremely useful to keep open.
LGTM.

cc: @stevehipwell - @alexandear - @Not-Dhananjay-Mishra