W2: course v2-format consistency fix + deep audit (scaffold, canon, split, 4-persona review) - #431
Merged
Conversation
…k, 1.3 add Success check, 1.4 $0-path co-equal at top of budget Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… outcome above TL;DR, 2.4 drop redundant three-tracks mermaid (keep funnel SVG), 2.5 add outcome + Success check, 2.6 Success check + outcome reposition Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.1/4.3/4.4: add outcome line above the TL;DR block. 4.2/4.5: reposition existing outcome line above the TL;DR (byte-identical move). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- 5.3, 5.6: add outcome line above TL;DR (Sam-voice, observable) - 5.1, 5.4, 5.5, 5.7: reposition existing outcome line above TL;DR (byte-identical) - 5.2: reposition + drop channel-decision.svg (decorative duplicate); keep channel-fit-canvas.svg as the lesson's single working visual (PDF companion, scoring thresholds live on it) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…isit-count canon Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…chet signatures Two real instances: kit Built-by block and hire-track stack-section intro. The Cagan '20 years' in reference/hire-decision-full is a distinct concept, untouched. Ratchet entries added in the same commit per the ratchet rule. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
hire-track-supplementary-reference was 2x over the 2,900 reference cap (5,558w). Split, moving sections whole: the Fractional CTO bridge + Reading the SOW (the contract half, incl. production hardening checklist and milestone-acceptance redline) move to new companion page fractional-cto-sow-reference; find-developers, stack conversation, and interview screen stay. Both pages now in the 1,100-2,900 band (2,890 / 2,893 on the Phase-1 basis). All inbound anchored links (#the-fractional-cto-bridge, #reading-the-sow, #production-hardening-*, #the-milestone-acceptance-redline) re-pointed across 13 course pages + 2 blog posts; link text renamed where it literally said 'hire-track reference' but now targets the companion. No aliases/redirects added. Sequence yaml comment lists the new supplementary slug; page not in the linear spine, matching its parent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.4 had TL;DR + read-2.3-first + relates-to-2.6 as three adjacent blockquotes; 2.5 had TL;DR + you-should-be-here-AFTER adjacent (T1 flag). Demote the relational/prerequisite callout to a plain paragraph on each - every fact and link preserved, standard nav-block + TL;DR untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- 5.1: fabricated-precision tri-list opener ($4,200/0.4%/40-users) -> question-shape opener; also keeps M5 mechanism-first count at 4 (cap) - 5.6: cinematic 'Then Week 8 lands' time-cut -> explanatory register, all facts kept (free-pilot enthusiasm, CFO circle-back, deposit) - 2.3: cloned 'The instinctive first move' lead-in + invented DM stats -> direct-address opener - vibe-prd-template + build-path-decision-worksheet closers: de-cloned the skip-X/six-weeks-later/salvage-question skeleton; the validated-problem-statement-template closer stays as the single canonical instance - 5 ratchet signatures added for the removed phrasings - build-path PDF regenerated (closer is in the printable body); untouched PDFs restored Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A gloss on page A does not cover page B - each page glosses at its own first mention, one Sam-voice clause: - SOC 2: hire-track ref, 4.1 decision tree, where-to-hire map - GA4: 1.5 (back-ref to 1.3 install), 1.4 Input line, course-map table - queues: 4.1 Q2 explainer (diagram said 'queues', body never explained it), 3.2 'async export queue' Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…split TL;DR (5.6 + course map + kit excerpt), Cursor seat $20-$40, M2-owned quote out of M3 walkthrough, Stripe fee capability language, first-timers generalization + 3 ratchet signatures Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… A); 5.3 reveal-twist one-edit fix (T7 F) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…+gloss+shape - $78K story now a pointer to the SOW Reading Guide (one page owns the story) - drop uncited 30% reply rate + 2-4-intros-in-48h claim - link Veracode GenAI Code Security Report 2025 to source - first-mention glosses: SOW, MSA, CSRF, RLS, pre-seed - pattern sands: cut 50%-co-founder negative-parallelism opener, big-tech two-beat flip, 'Two times is enough' aphorism, names/checks aphorism, test-mode/production flip stated once Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…able pointer, hire-track map caption, kit FCTO/SOW trigger row Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…/DPA carry the conditions) + 5.6 CFO-scene opener Also rides: 5.7 outcome line rewritten outcome-first (item 20) - same file as the refundable fix. Smoke-test $1/$97 refundable charges untouched (different mechanism). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…xpensive aphorisms, cite-tied 5.3 hook, fake-stripe flip softened Also rides: 5.3 TL;DR de-stutter (item 25) - same file as the hook fix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ge (2.4b/5.4/4.5), outcome lines outcome-first (2.6/4.3/1.4), Phase-1-check rename (4.4), TL;DR de-stutter (5.5-adjacent trio) + 5 ratchet signatures Ratchet: 'In early 2026, one SaaS founder', 'is cheaper than the contract it prevents', 'Two times is enough; one time is luck', 'Reply rate is around 30%', 'You do not need a 50% co-founder'. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… Lenny single-citation, captures verb swap Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (54)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe course canon and lesson content now use cancellation-specific deposit rules, a dedicated Fractional CTO/SOW reference, updated cross-links, clearer learning objectives, additional completion checks, revised examples, and expanded banned-string validation. ChangesCourse canon and paid-pilot rules
Fractional CTO reference split
Lesson instruction and validation updates
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
pftg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2026
…ule, split-carries-debt lesson Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
W2: course v2-format consistency fix + deep audit
Second wave of the course-improvement plan (20.15). Groomed → 5 parallel scaffold-fix tasks → cross-file sweeps → full audit → 4-persona cold-eyes panel → fix round → scroll gate. Content-only (markdown + one SVG deletion + data/yaml); no templates, no CSS, no JS.
What changed (19 commits)
Grooming (re-audited against the live tree, not stale 40.22): confirmed all three defect lists, found 2 new (2.3/2.4 missing "If this fails"; C3 scope = 6 adds + 10 repositions across all 16 TL;DR lessons), struck 1 stale item (landing C1, shipped in W1).
T1-T5 scaffold fixes (parallel worktrees):
fractional-cto-sow-reference(2,893w); 15 inbound links re-pointed, zero aliases; two "20 years" tenure claims → since-2011 canon.T6 cross-file sweeps: 2 callout-rhythm walls broken; 5 shape-tell openers/closers rewritten (invented stats dropped); 7 first-mention glosses; 5 ratchet signatures.
T7 full audit (Phases 3-6): 9 fixes incl. a HIGH seam defect — the kit's DPA excerpt had dropped the customer-cancel-refund half, showing readers only the forfeit side; 3 unqualified "refundable deposit" → canon cancel-split. Canon deposit row synced to carry the split. 5.3 reveal-twist one-edit fix.
T8 4-persona cold-eyes panel (ICP-Sam / voice / AI-feel / learning-experience) → synthesized 25-item fix round → voice re-check of the worst page. Panel verdicts: assessment spine PASS (both dropped visuals were redundancy, not dual-coding loss), split routing PASS, path integrity PASS, zero pages read more AI after W2 than before. The new
fractional-cto-sow-referencewas the fix hotspot (relocation exposed pre-modern-gate prose: uncited numbers, unglossed MSA/SOW/CSRF); one combined numbers+gloss pass cleared it. One critic finding rejected on evidence (a canon reply-band cross-assignment).Gates
bin/hugo-buildgreen every commit (8 course validators + banned-string ratchet, new signatures pass); OKF conformant.loading="lazy"; the walker probed a theme icon).overflow-x:autotreatment in course-single CSS, which is shared and campaign-window-frozen until W4; logged as a W4 input (tracker item 13). A content-side wrapper would break the tables under Hugo Goldmark.Content-only diff → per CLAUDE.md the visual suites (test/dtest) do not apply; hugo-build + scroll gate is the contracted gate.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Updates