Skip to content

MON-4028: Add Metric server config#2322

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
marioferh:metrics_server_config_monitoring_api
Sep 15, 2025
Merged

MON-4028: Add Metric server config#2322
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
marioferh:metrics_server_config_monitoring_api

Conversation

@marioferh

@marioferh marioferh commented May 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

First PR: #1929
Related: Enhancements Proposal openshift/enhancements#1627

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented May 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @marioferh! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label May 15, 2025
@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from JoelSpeed and deads2k May 15, 2025 14:08
@marioferh
marioferh force-pushed the metrics_server_config_monitoring_api branch from 8592b9b to 4a25999 Compare May 15, 2025 15:39
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go
@marioferh
marioferh force-pushed the metrics_server_config_monitoring_api branch from 4a25999 to d2369a1 Compare July 16, 2025 16:45
@marioferh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@marioferh
marioferh force-pushed the metrics_server_config_monitoring_api branch from d2369a1 to c38a1eb Compare July 16, 2025 16:47
@marioferh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@marioferh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance

Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
Comment thread config/v1alpha1/types_cluster_monitoring.go Outdated
@marioferh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@marioferh
marioferh force-pushed the metrics_server_config_monitoring_api branch from f88b3e5 to 6dfbbf6 Compare August 27, 2025 13:55
@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

verify-crd-schema check is failing on a false positive. We can safely override this.

The API looks good to me, but we have a lint failure that needs to be resolved.

@marioferh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

verify-crd-schema check is failing on a false positive. We can safely override this.

The API looks good to me, but we have a lint failure that needs to be resolved.

not sure why I have different issues with linter in local and in the CI, maybe different scripts?

@marioferh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@JoelSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

not sure why I have different issues with linter in local and in the CI, maybe different scripts?

Make sure you've rebase, make sure your code is checked out under $GOPATH/src/github.com/openshift/api, run make -c tools clean and then run the scripts again

@marioferh
marioferh force-pushed the metrics_server_config_monitoring_api branch from 928d99d to 557334f Compare August 29, 2025 08:33
@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

Overriding verify-crd-schema as it is failing on a false positive
/override ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 29, 2025
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@everettraven: Overrode contexts on behalf of everettraven: ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

Details

In response to this:

/approve
/lgtm

Overriding verify-crd-schema as it is failing on a false positive
/override ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@marioferh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@marioferh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@JoelSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2

Single test failure is definitely not related to this change

/hold until branching has happened tomorrow AM

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 1, 2025
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2

Single test failure is definitely not related to this change

/hold until branching has happened tomorrow AM

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@marioferh
marioferh force-pushed the metrics_server_config_monitoring_api branch from 557334f to 269309e Compare September 1, 2025 12:53
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2025

@marioferh marioferh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

needs /lgtm and skip again

Signed-off-by: Mario Fernandez <mariofer@redhat.com>
@marioferh
marioferh force-pushed the metrics_server_config_monitoring_api branch from 269309e to 881674e Compare September 1, 2025 13:04
@JoelSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

Overriding verify-crd-schema as it is failing on a false positive
/override ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2025
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: everettraven, JoelSpeed, marioferh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [JoelSpeed,everettraven]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

Details

In response to this:

/approve
/lgtm

Overriding verify-crd-schema as it is failing on a false positive
/override ci/prow/verify-crd-schema

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/tide refresh

@JoelSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

@marioferh How would you like to handle the verified label on this PR?

@JoelSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/hold cancel

Branching happened last week

/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 8, 2025
@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@marioferh now that the verified label is required, how would you like to get this change verified?

@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks like this is failing on the unrelated commatrix issue that Joel brought up to TRT and is going to be addressed as a separate bug.

Overriding.

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@everettraven: Overrode contexts on behalf of everettraven: ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2

Details

In response to this:

Looks like this is failing on the unrelated commatrix issue that Joel brought up to TRT and is going to be addressed as a separate bug.

Overriding.

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@juzhao

juzhao commented Sep 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/verified by @juzhao

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Sep 15, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@juzhao: This PR has been marked as verified by @juzhao.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @juzhao

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@marioferh: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot
openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 94481d7 into openshift:master Sep 15, 2025
27 checks passed
@marioferh marioferh changed the title Monitoring API: Add Metric server config MON-4028: Add Metric server config Sep 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants