Skip to content

preserve spark properties on async subquery tasks - #579

Merged
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
os/cherry-pick-27744
Jun 20, 2019
Merged

preserve spark properties on async subquery tasks#579
bulldozer-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
os/cherry-pick-27744

Conversation

@onursatici

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Upstream SPARK-XXXXX ticket and PR link (if not applicable, explain)

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27744
apache#24625

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

preserve spark properties on subquery exec tasks

How was this patch tested?

unit tests

}
}

test("SPARK-27744: Subquery execution preserves spark local properties") {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only question - does this fail without your change?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeap

@yifeih

yifeih commented Jun 20, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👍 lgtm

@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-bot Bot merged commit 5454b49 into master Jun 20, 2019
@bulldozer-bot
bulldozer-bot Bot deleted the os/cherry-pick-27744 branch June 20, 2019 10:50
@yifeih

yifeih commented Jun 20, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

oops i didn't know i could still merge things by giving it a 👍 .... @jboreiko @gatesn for SA

@jboreiko

Copy link
Copy Markdown

hey @yifeih should we revert and get more feedback or is this okay?

@yifeih

yifeih commented Jun 20, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The code looks fine to me, but I think @onursatici or @robert3005 will have more context on whether this is a risky or urgent change

@onursatici

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

It is not risky, but not that urgent as well, good to have in the next release though

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants