Skip to content

docs: Adds an example showing how to use groups (nested)#32

Merged
bougyman merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
group-example
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

docs: Adds an example showing how to use groups (nested)#32
bougyman merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
group-example

Conversation

@bougyman

@bougyman bougyman commented Aug 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@bougyman bougyman added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 9, 2025
@bougyman bougyman self-assigned this Aug 9, 2025
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 9, 2025 19:29
@bougyman bougyman added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 9, 2025

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a new example demonstrating how to use nested groups in the Leopard NATS API server framework. The example shows the creation of hierarchical service groups with specific queue configurations.

  • Creates a ServiceGroups class that demonstrates nested group functionality
  • Shows how to define endpoints within specific groups with queue configurations
  • Provides a runnable example with proper logging and service configuration

@bougyman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request

Co-authored-by: bougyman <6848+bougyman@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request

Resolved by merging the latest main into this branch and fixing the Gemfile.lock conflict using the updated mainline lockfile state. Commit: da4ecea.

@bougyman
bougyman enabled auto-merge (squash) July 23, 2026 21:08

@OpenSourceAlchemist OpenSourceAlchemist left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might want to use SemanticLogger.add_signal_handler here for consistency, but otherwise LGTM.

@bougyman
bougyman merged commit 121dcef into main Jul 24, 2026
5 checks passed
@bougyman
bougyman deleted the group-example branch July 24, 2026 12:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants