Conversation
Add function to delete global application commands
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky <111157596+xNickyDev@users.noreply.github.com>
Added $translateText and $chalkLog
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://cdn.github.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| const FunctionCategoryRegex = /\r?\n(.*)(category: "\$?(\w+)"),?/m; | ||
| const ArgEnumRegex = /(?:enum: +(\w+),?|Arg\.(?:\w+)Enum\([\r\n\t ]?(\w+))/gim; | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((\w+|ArgType.(\w+)),?)+\]),/im; | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+),?)+\]),/im; |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Inefficient regular expression
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI about 1 year ago
To fix the issue, we need to rewrite the OutputRegex regular expression to eliminate ambiguity and nested quantifiers that can lead to exponential backtracking. Specifically:
- Replace ambiguous patterns like
\w+andarray(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?with more precise and non-overlapping patterns. - Use atomic grouping or possessive quantifiers where appropriate to prevent backtracking.
- Ensure the rewritten regular expression maintains the same functionality as the original.
The changes will be applied to the OutputRegex definition on line 13.
Suggested changeset
1
dist/functions/generateMetadata.js
| @@ -12,3 +12,3 @@ | ||
| const ArgEnumRegex = /(?:enum: +(\w+),?|Arg\.(?:\w+)Enum\([\r\n\t ]?(\w+))/gim; | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+),?)+\]),/im; | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(?:<[\w.]+>)?\([\w]*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+|\[(?:array(?:<[\w.]+>)?\([\w]*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+)(?:, (?:array(?:<[\w.]+>)?\([\w]*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+))*\]),/im; | ||
| function getOutputValues(fn, txt, enums) { |
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Unable to commit as this autofix suggestion is now outdated
| const FunctionCategoryRegex = /\r?\n(.*)(category: "\$?(\w+)"),?/m; | ||
| const ArgEnumRegex = /(?:enum: +(\w+),?|Arg\.(?:\w+)Enum\([\r\n\t ]?(\w+))/gim; | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((\w+|ArgType.(\w+)),?)+\]),/im; | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+),?)+\]),/im; |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Inefficient regular expression
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI about 1 year ago
To fix the issue, we need to rewrite the OutputRegex regular expression to eliminate ambiguities and nested quantifiers that can cause exponential backtracking. Specifically:
- Replace ambiguous patterns like
\w+andArgType\.\w+with more specific and non-overlapping patterns. - Use atomic grouping or possessive quantifiers (if supported) to prevent backtracking.
- Simplify the regex structure where possible to reduce complexity.
The updated regex will ensure that the matching process is linear in complexity, even for edge cases.
Suggested changeset
1
dist/functions/generateMetadata.js
| @@ -12,3 +12,3 @@ | ||
| const ArgEnumRegex = /(?:enum: +(\w+),?|Arg\.(?:\w+)Enum\([\r\n\t ]?(\w+))/gim; | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+),?)+\]),/im; | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType\.(\w+)|\[((?:array(?:<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+)(?:, ?))*\]),/im; | ||
| function getOutputValues(fn, txt, enums) { |
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Unable to commit as this autofix suggestion is now outdated
| @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ | |||
| const FunctionNameRegex = /(name: "\$?(\w+)"),?/m | |||
| const FunctionCategoryRegex = /\r?\n(.*)(category: "\$?(\w+)"),?/m | |||
| const ArgEnumRegex = /(?:enum: +(\w+),?|Arg\.(?:\w+)Enum\([\r\n\t ]?(\w+))/gim | |||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((\w+|ArgType.(\w+)),?)+\]),/im | |||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+),?)+\]),/im | |||
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Inefficient regular expression
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI about 1 year ago
To fix the issue, we need to rewrite the OutputRegex regular expression to eliminate ambiguity and reduce the potential for exponential backtracking. Specifically:
- Replace ambiguous sub-expressions like
\w+with more specific patterns that do not overlap with other alternatives. - Use atomic grouping (
(?>...)) or possessive quantifiers (if supported) to prevent backtracking where possible. - Simplify the regex by breaking it into smaller, more manageable parts if necessary.
The updated regex will ensure that the matching process is efficient and avoids exponential time complexity.
Suggested changeset
1
src/functions/generateMetadata.ts
| @@ -14,3 +14,3 @@ | ||
| const ArgEnumRegex = /(?:enum: +(\w+),?|Arg\.(?:\w+)Enum\([\r\n\t ]?(\w+))/gim | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+),?)+\]),/im | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType\.(\w+)|\[((?:array(?:<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|ArgType\.\w+)(?:,(?:array(?:<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|ArgType\.\w+))*)\]),/im | ||
|
|
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Unable to commit as this autofix suggestion is now outdated
| @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ | |||
| const FunctionNameRegex = /(name: "\$?(\w+)"),?/m | |||
| const FunctionCategoryRegex = /\r?\n(.*)(category: "\$?(\w+)"),?/m | |||
| const ArgEnumRegex = /(?:enum: +(\w+),?|Arg\.(?:\w+)Enum\([\r\n\t ]?(\w+))/gim | |||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((\w+|ArgType.(\w+)),?)+\]),/im | |||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+),?)+\]),/im | |||
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Inefficient regular expression
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI about 1 year ago
To fix the issue, we need to rewrite the OutputRegex regular expression to remove ambiguity and reduce the risk of catastrophic backtracking. Specifically:
- Replace ambiguous patterns like
\w+with more specific patterns that match the expected input. - Simplify nested alternations and repetitions to make the regex more efficient.
- Ensure that the regex still matches the intended patterns without introducing new bugs.
The updated regex will explicitly handle the expected cases without relying on overly broad patterns like \w+. This change will be made directly in the definition of OutputRegex on line 15.
Suggested changeset
1
src/functions/generateMetadata.ts
| @@ -14,3 +14,3 @@ | ||
| const ArgEnumRegex = /(?:enum: +(\w+),?|Arg\.(?:\w+)Enum\([\r\n\t ]?(\w+))/gim | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|(\w+)|ArgType.(\w+)|\[((array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|\w+|ArgType\.\w+),?)+\]),/im | ||
| const OutputRegex = /output:(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\((\w+)?\)|ArgType\.(\w+)|\[((array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|ArgType\.\w+)(?:,\s*(array(<[A-Za-z.]+>)?\(\w*\)|ArgType\.\w+))*)\]),/im | ||
|
|
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Unable to commit as this autofix suggestion is now outdated
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.